| 
                       A comparison was made by building FEA 
                        models of the largest component in the frame, in both 
                        materials. Although slightly heavier, aluminium was chosen 
                        because it would be easier to modify when further changes 
                        were needed on the new prototype and it would be more 
                        cost effective for a small initial production batch. 
                       Our consultants also investigated whether to share the 
                        loads between the frame and the panels. Although this 
                        could save some weight, it was not done in the prototype 
                        because speed of assembly and ease of changing damaged 
                        panels in service were considered more important. By also 
                        redesigning and deleting some parts the weight of the 
                        chassis/ frame was reduced from 9.75 to just 3.7kg. 
                     |